Case study:Rehabilitation of Benta stream: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Measures | {{Measures | ||
|Bank and bed modifications measure= | |Bank and bed modifications measure=Renewal of reventments,Removal of sediment,Planting,Creation of fish spawn nursing places,Creation of pipelines | ||
|Other technical measure=Reparation of sluice gates | |||
|Management interventions=channel maintenance | |||
|Social measures=Floodprotection,landenhancement | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement=Information provision | |||
|Other technical measure= | |||
|Management interventions= | |||
|Social measures= | |||
|Wider stakeholder / citizen engagement= | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} | {{Hydromorphological_quality_elements_header}} |
Revision as of 09:42, 31 May 2017
Location: 47° 19' 14.63" N, 18° 55' 28.63" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.kdvvizig.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&catid=83:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&Itemid=99 |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Hungary |
Main contact forename | Norbertné |
Main contact surname | Józsa |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|