Case study:Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
|Location=50.3, 74.04
|Location= 74.04, 50.3
}}
}}
{{Project overview
{{Project overview

Revision as of 06:08, 6 September 2012

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 74° 2' 24.00" N, 50° 18' 0.00" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Romania
Main contact forename Fica
Main contact surname Boldea
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
Contact organisation web site http://www.rowater.ro/daprut/default.aspx;
Partner organisations University of Bucharest – Centre for Environmental Research and Impact Studies; Romania Romanian Ornithological Society; Galaţi Forestry District
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina
Map of the multi-site project

Project summary

This case study hasn’t got any project summary, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Prut Barlad

Subcatchment

River name Prut
Area category Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Siliceous
Ecoregion Eastern Plains
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake, The Ciobarciu Wetland Project


Site

Edit site
Name Pochina Lake
WFD water body codes ROLW13.1_B5.2
WFD (national) typology ROLN01
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Side ponds
Reference morphology Single channel, Supply channel and discharge channel wich gravitational transfer a sufficient water volum to contribute to the conservation of this special area
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate Silt, Sedimentary rocks (mixture of sand and mud of fluviatile origin).
River corridor land use Wetland
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2005/11/01
Works started 2006/05/01
Works completed 2006/06/01
Project completed
Total cost category 10 - 50 k€
Total cost (k€) 31 k€31,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources From LIFE Nature Programm; Co-financig Ministry of Environment and County Council Galati, Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Less than 1 k€ 0.737 k€737 € <br /> Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (REPA Galati) Fica Boldea
Stakeholder engagement and communication Regional Agenty for Environmental Protection Galati (RAEP Galati) Fica Boldea
Works and works supervision Less than 1 k€ 0.368 k€368 € <br />
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Width & depth variation
Biology
Physico-chemical Oxygen balance
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other The two channels for Vlăşcuţa Lake (in total length of about 542 m) were reshaped and consolidated, so that they assure the supply and the evacuation from/to lake/river Prut, subject to necessary water level of the lake.
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other Information provision


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Width & depth variation Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Natural Lake Pochina during restoration
Pochina Lake after restoration


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information