Case study:The Ciobarciu Wetland Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|Contact organisation=Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority | |Contact organisation=Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority | ||
|Contact organisation url=www.apeprut.ro | |Contact organisation url=www.apeprut.ro | ||
|Partner organisations=Institute for Inland Water Management RIZA, Regional Water Board Hunze&Aa's, Het Drentse Landschap (NGO for nature management) | |||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Ciobarciu Wetland present situation.jpg | |Project picture=Ciobarciu Wetland present situation.jpg | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
|Project summary=The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut. | |Project summary=The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut. | ||
In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow. | In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow. | ||
The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area. | The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_subcatchment | {{Case_study_subcatchment |
Revision as of 07:50, 4 September 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.ciobarciu.ro |
Themes | Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Romania |
Main contact forename | Anca |
Main contact surname | Savin |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.apeprut.ro |
Partner organisations | Institute for Inland Water Management RIZA, Regional Water Board Hunze&Aa's, Het Drentse Landschap (NGO for nature management) |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut.
In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow.
The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Danube |
---|---|
River basin | Prut Barlad |
Subcatchment
River name | Prut |
---|---|
Area category | Less than 10 km² |
Area (km2) | |
Maximum altitude category | 100 - 200 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | |
Dominant geology | Siliceous |
Ecoregion | Eastern Plains |
Dominant land cover | |
Waterbody ID |
Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake
Site
Name | Ciobarciu |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | RORW13.1.15_B5 |
WFD (national) typology | RO09a |
WFD water body name | |
Pre-project morphology | Embanked |
Reference morphology | Sinuous |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | Yes |
National/international site designation | EU - Special Protected Area |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | |
Dominant hydrology | Artificially regulated |
Dominant substrate | Silt |
River corridor land use | Intensive agriculture (arable) |
Average bankfull channel width category | Less than 2 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | |
Average bankfull channel depth category | 0.5 - 2 m |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | 0.001 |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 5,500 m5.5 km <br />550,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | 2003/03/01 |
Works started | 2006/06/01 |
Works completed | 2006/10/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | 100 - 500 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | 388 k€388,000 € <br /> |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | The Netherlands Gouvernment program
MATRA; Co-financing Ministry of Environment and Water Management |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | Regional water authority Hunze & Aa’s www.hunzeenaas.nl | Albert | Remmelzwaal | ||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority | Dan | Badarau | ||
Works and works supervision | Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority | Anca | Savin | ||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring | Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority |
Reasons for river restoration
Mitigation of a pressure | Flood risk management |
---|---|
Hydromorphology | Continuity for organisms |
Biology | |
Physico-chemical | Nutrient concentrations |
Other reasons for the project |
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | |
Floodplain / River corridor | Creation of wetlands/removal of embankments |
Planform / Channel pattern | Re-instatement of old course |
Other | Restoration flow on old Jijia |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | Land purchase/Improved public access |
Other | Consultation |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Continuity for organisms | Improvement |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Fish: Species composition | Improvement |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|---|
http://www.ciobarciu.ro | The website of the project |