Case study:The Ciobarciu Wetland Project

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00

(0 votes)

To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.

Location: 47° 3' 23.09" N, 27° 51' 9.64" E

Edit location

Loading map...

{"format":"googlemaps3","type":"HYBRID","minzoom":false,"maxzoom":false,"types":["ROADMAP","SATELLITE","HYBRID","TERRAIN"],"limit":50,"offset":0,"link":"all","sort":[""],"order":[],"headers":"show","mainlabel":"","intro":"","outro":"","searchlabel":"... further results","default":"","import-annotation":false,"width":"auto","height":"400px","centre":false,"title":"","label":"","icon":"","lines":[],"polygons":[],"circles":[],"rectangles":[],"copycoords":false,"static":false,"visitedicon":"","wmsoverlay":false,"zoom":14,"layers":[],"controls":["pan","zoom","type","scale","streetview","rotate"],"zoomstyle":"DEFAULT","typestyle":"DEFAULT","autoinfowindows":false,"resizable":false,"kmlrezoom":false,"poi":true,"cluster":false,"clustergridsize":60,"clustermaxzoom":20,"clusterzoomonclick":true,"clusteraveragecenter":true,"clusterminsize":2,"imageoverlays":[],"kml":[],"gkml":[""],"searchmarkers":"","fullscreen":false,"scrollwheelzoom":false,"showtitle":false,"hidenamespace":true,"template":"Location map popup","userparam":"","activeicon":"","pagelabel":false,"ajaxcoordproperty":"","ajaxquery":"","locations":[{"text":"\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Title:\u003C/b\u003E The Ciobarciu Wetland Project\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003ECountry:\u003C/b\u003E \u003Ca href=\"/wiki/index.php?title=Romania\" title=\"Romania\"\u003ERomania\u003C/a\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EProject Status:\u003C/b\u003E Complete\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cb\u003EThemes:\u003C/b\u003E Habitat and biodiversity\n\u003C/p\u003E\u003Cp\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\n\u003C/p\u003E","title":"The Ciobarciu Wetland Project","link":"","lat":47.048921,"lon":27.85965,"icon":"/wiki/images/a/af/Red_marker.png"}]}

Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.

Project overview

Edit project overview

Status	Complete
Project web site	http://www.ciobarciu.ro
Themes	Habitat and biodiversity
Country	Romania
Main contact forename	Anca
Main contact surname	Savin
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation	Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority
Contact organisation web site	http://www.apeprut.ro
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects	No

Ciobarciu Wetland - present situation

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.

The Ciobarciu Wetland Project is an ecological rehabilitation project in the valley of the river Prut. In order to prevent flooding and to extend agricultural surfaces, the common floodplain of Prut and Jijia was embanked. Jijia river course was deviated by digging a channel to the Prut at Chiperesti. The last 56 km of the Jijia river, which is parallel to the Prut, has been cut-off (it is now known as the Old Jijia). The Old Jijia can be supplied with water from the Jijia by the hydrotechnical knot at Chiperesti when needed. Otherwise, the Old Jijia is only supplied from its own river basin by four small tributaries with intermittent flow. The Ciobarciu Wetland was created in October 2006 after first flooding of this area.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment

Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district	Danube
River basin	Prut Barlad

Subcatchment

River name	Prut
Area category	Less than 10 km²
Area (km2)
Maximum altitude category	100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology	Siliceous
Ecoregion	Eastern Plains
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID

Other case studies in this subcatchment: Ecological Restoration of Mata-Radeanu Complex, Ecological Restoration of Natural Lake Pochina, Ecological Restoration of Vlascuta Lake

Site

Edit site

Name	Ciobarciu
WFD water body codes	RORW13.1.15_B5
WFD (national) typology	RO09a
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology	Embanked
Reference morphology	Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body	true
National/international site designation	EU - Special Protected Area
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology	Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate	Silt
River corridor land use	Intensive agriculture (arable)
Average bankfull channel width category	Less than 2 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category	0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)	0.5 - 6"-6" is not declared as a valid unit of measurement for this property.
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient	0.001
Average unit stream power (W/m2)

Project background

Edit project background

Reach length directly affected (m)	5,500 m5.5 km <br />550,000 cm <br />
Project started	2003/03/01
Works started	2006/06/01
Works completed	2006/10/01
Project completed
Total cost category	100 - 500 k€
Total cost (k€)	388 k€388,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources	The Netherlands Gouvernment program MATRA; Co-financing Ministry of Environment and Water Management

Cost for project phases

Phase	cost category	cost exact (k€)	Lead organisation	Contact forename	Contact surname
Investigation and design			Regional water authority Hunze & Aa’s www.hunzeenaas.nl	Albert	Remmelzwaal
Stakeholder engagement and communication			Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority	Dan	Badarau
Works and works supervision			Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority	Anca	Savin
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring			Prut - Barlad River Basin Authority

Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration

Mitigation of a pressure	Flood risk management
Hydromorphology	Continuity for organisms
Biology
Physico-chemical	Nutrient concentrations
Other reasons for the project

Measures

Edit Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor	Creation of wetlands/removal of embankments
Planform / Channel pattern	Re-instatement of old course
Other	Restoration flow on old Jijia
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)	Land purchase/Improved public access
Other	Consultation

Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Continuity for organisms						Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative
Fish: Species composition						Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses

Element	When monitored		Type of monitoring		Control site used	Result
	Before measures	After measures	Qualitative	Quantitative

Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents

Image gallery

Edit Image gallery

Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents

Additional links and references

Edit links and references

Link	Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information