Case study:SEE River Project: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 38: Line 38:
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Case study image
|File name=Drava Baldramsdorf riverrestoration.jpg
|Caption=Drava_Austria
}}
{{Case study image
|File name=3 Castle Borl C Borut Stumberger.jpg
|Caption=Drava_Slovenia
}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle button}}

Revision as of 11:43, 2 November 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

3.00
(one vote)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 46° 28' 52.58" N, 15° 44' 42.63" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status In progress
Project web site http://www.see-river.net
Themes Flood risk management, Hydropower, Land use management - agriculture, Land use management - forestry, Social benefits, Spatial planning, Urban
Country Albania, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Hungary, Italy, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia
Main contact forename Aleš
Main contact surname Bizjak
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Institute for water of the Republic of Slovenia
Contact organisation web site http://izvrs.si
Partner organisations IZVRS, IRSNC, PRC, AKL-SchWW, BMLFUW, WWF, WBV, DDVIZIG, NEKI, NARW, SHI, DZZP, HR. VODE, KCKZZ, HEIS, AGS, IJC
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


SEE River Project is intended to reach a common agreement on river corridor management for harmonisation of both – development and conservation interests. This will be achieved by close cooperation of experts from wide range of fields from different countries and active involvement of stakeholders from local river areas and national or regional authorities. The project is introducing a new approach to river and land management by focusing on the river corridor as the selected, local river area where most pressures occur.

Project activities and findings will result in the SEE River Toolkit, a generally applicable and innovative model and guidance on how to reach future sustainable use of river corridors by taking into account and harmonizing different stakeholder interests. To develop and implement the SEE River Toolkit, project research, field work and active involvement of stakeholders will be performed in river corridors of 6 SEE rivers: Drava, Bodrog, Neretva, Prut, Soča and Vjosa. The project lasts from October 2012 until September 2014.

Monitoring surveys and results

Edit project overview to modify the Monitoring survey and results.


Main objective: To empower the multi-sectoral stakeholders sharing the territory of an international river corridor to gain knowledge on river corridor management, exceeding sectoral, local and national interests in order to ensure good water status and flood protection, preserve nature, biodiversity and ecosystems, and to enable development at the same time.

Specific objectives of the project are: To develop a joint approach (SEE River Tolkit) for integrative management of international river corridors; the Toolkit will give guidance on planning and implementing procedures for harmonisation and prioritisation of heterogeneous sectoral policies, plans and programmes related to management of international rivers.

To apply the joint approach (Toolkit) to agree on future joint actions that will ensure integrative management of the International Drava River Corridor (Drava River Action Plan); key institutions from all five Drava-riparian countries will work together to reach consensus on vision, goals and actions for future management of the international Drava River Corridor.

To work together with local, regional and national stakeholders in the five Drava-riparian countries to reach multi-sectoral agreements on concrete actions to implement the internationally agreed Drava River vision; the agreed Local Action Plans will be the basis for management of the selected river corridors on local levels.

To use and promote the Toolkit on 5 additional international river corridors for Bodrog, Neretva, Prut, Soca, and Vjosa rivers; Draft Action Plans for future cooperation in management of these rivers will be prepared by establishing transboundary stakeholder partnerships in all riparian countries.

To improve the transboundary and cross-sectoral cooperation of existing bodies responsible for managing international rivers by involving them in the process of seeking consensus on future action plans for integrative management on all 6 rivers.

To facilitate the implementation of relevant EU legislation, in particular the Water Framework Directive, the Flood Directive, the Habitat Directive, the Birds Directive and the Renewable Resources Directive.

To increase capacity and raise awareness of stakeholders along international river corridors on importance of transboundary and cross-sectoral approach to sustainable integrative management of river corridors by organising partner trainings, stakeholder workshops and capacity building seminars for addressed stakeholders.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


Drava_Austria
Drava_Slovenia
ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment



Site

Name
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology
Reference morphology
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information