Case study:Historic Mill Restoration Project: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|Main contact surname=Ole Hansen | |Main contact surname=Ole Hansen | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project picture=Historic Mill 1.JPG | |||
|Picture description=Area of the project | |||
|Project summary=Reducing the risk of flooding, tackling subsidence and improving access for fish was dealt with by removing sluice gates and installing a weir allowing fish to swim over more easily. Retaining the historic mill and mill pond were central to the scheme. Economic, social and environmental benefits have been reported in a project that dealt sensitively with the cultural heritage at the site. | |Project summary=Reducing the risk of flooding, tackling subsidence and improving access for fish was dealt with by removing sluice gates and installing a weir allowing fish to swim over more easily. Retaining the historic mill and mill pond were central to the scheme. Economic, social and environmental benefits have been reported in a project that dealt sensitively with the cultural heritage at the site. | ||
Works: | Works: | ||
Line 25: | Line 27: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | {{Image gallery}} | ||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Historic Mill 2.JPG | |||
|Caption=Lateral sheet piling used to create the weir | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Historic Mill 3.JPG | |||
|Caption=Sheet piling faced with concret | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Historic Mill 4.JPG | |||
|Caption=The structure once vegetated | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Historic Mill 5.JPG | |||
|Caption=Cultural legacy: Historic Mill retained | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Bachmanns Mill Pond AFTER rest - 10-07-24 - OLE.JPG | |||
|Caption=Bachmanns Mill Pond - after restoration (1) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Bachmanns Mill Pond AFTER rest - 10-07-24 - OLE (1).JPG | |||
|Caption=Bachmanns Mill Pond - after restoration (2) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Bachmanns Mill Pond AFTER rest - 10-07-24 - OLE (2).JPG | |||
|Caption=Bachmanns Mill Pond - after restoration (3) | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Bachmanns Mill pond BEFORE rest - 09-05-06.JPG | |||
|Caption=Bachmanns Mill pond - before restoration | |||
}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | {{Image gallery end}} | ||
{{Toggle button}} | {{Toggle button}} | ||
{{Toggle content start}} | {{Toggle content start}} | ||
{{Case study subcatchment}} | {{Case study subcatchment}} | ||
{{Site}} | {{Site | ||
{{Project background}} | |Name=Bachmanns Water Mill (River Vida, Tonder) | ||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |||
|Protected species present=No | |||
|Invasive species present=No | |||
}} | |||
{{Project background | |||
|Total cost category=1000 - 5000 k€ | |||
|Total1 cost=1370 | |||
}} | |||
{{Motivations}} | {{Motivations}} | ||
{{Measures}} | {{Measures}} |
Latest revision as of 15:22, 18 October 2013
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity, Social benefits |
Country | Denmark |
Main contact forename | Hans |
Main contact surname | Ole Hansen |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Reducing the risk of flooding, tackling subsidence and improving access for fish was dealt with by removing sluice gates and installing a weir allowing fish to swim over more easily. Retaining the historic mill and mill pond were central to the scheme. Economic, social and environmental benefits have been reported in a project that dealt sensitively with the cultural heritage at the site.
Works:
1. The mill pond and river were separated with a sheet-piled, concrete-faced weir. Flood banks were set back to
increase capacity for flood waters.
2. Sluice gates and the fish ladder upstream of the mill bridge were removed. The millpond was retained as a functioning nursery area for fish.
3. Downstream of the mill, spawning grounds were formed by creating areas of shallower water using gravel (riffles). Resting areas (backwaters) were created and an otter pass was built under the bridge.
4. A new access point downstream of the mill was made for the Tønder Rowing Club to minimise disturbance to nature.
5. 700m of wetlands was created downstream of Tønder to create a wider nature corridor. This has been very popular with walkers and local people.
Benefits: Historic mill retained; Aesthetic improvements have led to an increase in local house prices; Public access to nature improved - wetland walk; Balanced project aims with recreational needs; Improved river habitat; Fish pass more freely past the mill; Passage for houting has been restored.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
• Taking into account the historic context of the site, the project was delivered sensitively.
• The legacy of the project will benefit wildlife and people in a number of ways (access to nature, recreation).
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|