Case study:Rehabilitation of Benta stream: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|Project summary=The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish. | |Project summary=The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Benta stream1.jpg | |||
|Caption=Benta stream_1 | |||
}} | |||
{{Case study image | |||
|File name=Benta stream2.jpg | |||
|Caption=Benta stram_2 | |||
}} | |||
{{Image_gallery_end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case_study_subcatchment | {{Case_study_subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment= | |Subcatchment= | ||
Line 288: | Line 300: | ||
{{Monitoring_documents}} | {{Monitoring_documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring_documents_end}} | {{Monitoring_documents_end}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents}} | {{Additional_Documents}} | ||
{{Additional_Documents_end}} | {{Additional_Documents_end}} | ||
Line 342: | Line 344: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Case_study_upload}} | {{Case_study_upload}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Revision as of 09:22, 6 September 2013
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | http://www.kdvvizig.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&catid=83:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&Itemid=99 |
Themes | Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Hungary |
Main contact forename | Norbertné |
Main contact surname | Józsa |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
Project summary
The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|