Case study:Diversion of the River Nith: Difference between revisions
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Mattleeson (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
|WFD (national) typology=Mid, Small, Calcareous | |WFD (national) typology=Mid, Small, Calcareous | ||
|WFD water body name=River Nith (u/s New Cumnock) | |WFD water body name=River Nith (u/s New Cumnock) | ||
|Reference morphology= | |Reference morphology=Reproduce hydromorphology and planform of former channel. | ||
|Heavily modified water body=No | |Heavily modified water body=No | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No |
Revision as of 14:40, 21 August 2012
This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Economic aspects, Habitat and biodiversity |
Country | Scotland |
Main contact forename | Nick |
Main contact surname | Elbourne |
Main contact user ID | User:NickRRC |
Contact organisation | River Restoration Centre |
Contact organisation web site | |
Partner organisations | East Ayrshire Council, SEPA, SNH, RSPB, Nith Salmon Fisheries Board, New Cumnock Angling Association, Halcrow, River Restoration Centre |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
PHASE 1: 2000 - Temporary diversion of the Nith to the north west of its current floodplain to allow for coal extraction by Scottish Coal.
The Nith is an important salmon and trout fishery, however overgrazing, agriculture and past open-cast mining along the reach have affected invertebrate populations and fish spawning grounds.
The primary restoration criteria for the 2000 restoration were:
- design which would convey a 1 in 50 year flood.
- channel which would not dry up during low flow.
- design mimicing pre-diversion channel - ie. similar meander loops, pool-riffle-run sequences and channel profiles.
- design which would create opportunities for enhancement of biodiversity (over and above pre-diversion conditions).
Work commenced in April 2000 and was completed during September of the same year.
PHASE 2: During 2004, the former course was enhanced and reconnected to the rest of the river and the temporary channel cut off to allow mining to progress across the floodplain. The site was subject to significant post-restoration biological monitoring as part of a PhD programme through CRESS (Centre for River Ecosystem Science - University of Stirling) - to ensure the new channel was performing well, ecologically.
Monitoring surveys and results
Lessons learnt
Catchment and subcatchment
Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)
Catchment
River basin district | Scotland RBD |
---|---|
River basin | Solway |
Subcatchment
River name | Nith |
---|---|
Area category | 1000 - 10000 km² |
Area (km2) | 12301,230 km² <br />123,000 ha <br /> |
Maximum altitude category | 200 - 500 m |
Maximum altitude (m) | 500500 m <br />0.5 km <br />50,000 cm <br /> |
Dominant geology | |
Ecoregion | Great Britain |
Dominant land cover | |
Waterbody ID |
Site
Name | Nith, west of New Cumnock |
---|---|
WFD water body codes | 10612 |
WFD (national) typology | Mid, Small, Calcareous |
WFD water body name | River Nith (u/s New Cumnock) |
Pre-project morphology | |
Reference morphology | Reproduce hydromorphology and planform of former channel. |
Desired post project morphology | |
Heavily modified water body | No |
National/international site designation | |
Local/regional site designations | |
Protected species present | No |
Invasive species present | No |
Species of interest | Primarily salmon and brown trout. |
Dominant hydrology | |
Dominant substrate | Mixed gravel, pebble and boulder |
River corridor land use | Pasture and open-cast mining. |
Average bankfull channel width category | 2 - 5 m |
Average bankfull channel width (m) | 4.54.5 m <br />0.0045 km <br />450 cm <br /> |
Average bankfull channel depth category | |
Average bankfull channel depth (m) | |
Mean discharge category | |
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) | |
Average channel gradient category | |
Average channel gradient | |
Average unit stream power (W/m2) |
Project background
Reach length directly affected (m) | 30003,000 m <br />3 km <br />300,000 cm <br /> |
---|---|
Project started | |
Works started | 2000/04/01 |
Works completed | 2000/09/01 |
Project completed | |
Total cost category | more than 10000 k€ |
Total cost (k€) | |
Benefit to cost ratio | |
Funding sources | Developer (mining company) |
Cost for project phases
Phase | cost category | cost exact (k€) | Lead organisation | Contact forename | Contact surname |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Investigation and design | Halcrow | ||||
Stakeholder engagement and communication | |||||
Works and works supervision | Morrison | ||||
Post-project management and maintenance | |||||
Monitoring | University of Stirling |
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
Structural measures
| |
---|---|
Bank/bed modifications | Geotextile reinforcement of banks, to reduce bank erosion. Clay mattress lining to prevent water percolating through unconsolidated substrate and flowing as groundwater through potentially contaminated mine tailings. Gravel added to bed to provide habitat diversity for invertebrates and fish. |
Floodplain / River corridor | |
Planform / Channel pattern | |
Other | Addition of boulders to bed, to provide habitat for fish. |
Non-structural measures
| |
Management interventions | |
Social measures (incl. engagement) | |
Other |
Monitoring
Hydromorphological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Biological quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Macrophytes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Awaiting results |
Invertebrates | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Awaiting results |
Physico-chemical quality elements
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative |
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Element | When monitored | Type of monitoring | Control site used | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before measures | After measures | Qualitative | Quantitative | |||
Channel bed morphology. | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No | |
Substrate particle size/composition. | No | Yes | No | Yes | No |
Monitoring documents
Image gallery
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Link | Description |
---|---|
http://www.cress.stir.ac.uk/news/documents/CharlesPerfect.pdf | Macrophyte Monitoring |
Supplementary Information
Edit Supplementary Information