Case study:Merikoski fishway: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Case study status | {{Case study status | ||
|Approval status= | |Approval status=Approved | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Location | {{Location | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River | |Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River | ||
|Multi-site=No | |Multi-site=No | ||
|Project summary=Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merikoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003. The constructed fishway now enables | |Project picture=Oulujoki.PNG | ||
|Picture description=The Merikoski Fishway (Photo: Pinja Kasvio) | |||
|Project summary=Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merikoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003. The constructed fishway now enables salmon and other migtating fish to rise up 40 km to the lower reaches of the Oulujoki river. | |||
Migratory fishes are planted into the Merikoski every year. Also the fish migration, the amount and types of the fishes are monitored with the help of underwater videocamera and fish counter. | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{Image gallery}} | |||
{{Image gallery end}} | |||
{{Toggle button}} | |||
{{Toggle content start}} | |||
{{Case study subcatchment | {{Case study subcatchment | ||
|Subcatchment=Oulujoki River Basin | |Subcatchment=Oulujoki River Basin | ||
Line 27: | Line 34: | ||
|Protected species present=No | |Protected species present=No | ||
|Invasive species present=No | |Invasive species present=No | ||
|Species=Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), | |||
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated | |Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 42: | Line 50: | ||
{{Monitoring documents}} | {{Monitoring documents}} | ||
{{Monitoring documents end}} | {{Monitoring documents end}} | ||
{{Additional Documents}} | {{Additional Documents}} | ||
{{Additional Documents end}} | {{Additional Documents end}} | ||
Line 49: | Line 55: | ||
{{Additional links and references footer}} | {{Additional links and references footer}} | ||
{{Supplementary Information}} | {{Supplementary Information}} | ||
{{Toggle content end}} |
Latest revision as of 07:06, 6 September 2013
Location: 65° 1' 18.97" N, 25° 29' 15.05" E
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.
Project overview
Status | Complete |
---|---|
Project web site | |
Themes | Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower |
Country | Finland |
Main contact forename | Anne |
Main contact surname | Laine |
Main contact user ID | |
Contact organisation | Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for North Ostrobothnia |
Contact organisation web site | http://www.oulunenergia.fi/ymparistovastuu/kalatie |
Partner organisations | |
Parent multi-site project | |
This is a parent project encompassing the following projects |
No |
Project summary
Edit project overview to modify the project summary.
Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merikoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003. The constructed fishway now enables salmon and other migtating fish to rise up 40 km to the lower reaches of the Oulujoki river.
Migratory fishes are planted into the Merikoski every year. Also the fish migration, the amount and types of the fishes are monitored with the help of underwater videocamera and fish counter.
Monitoring surveys and results
This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Lessons learnt
This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.
Image gallery
Catchment and subcatchmentSelect a catchment/subcatchment
Catchment
Subcatchment
Site
Project background
Cost for project phases
Reasons for river restoration
Measures
MonitoringHydromorphological quality elements
Biological quality elements
Physico-chemical quality elements
Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic
Monitoring documents
Additional documents and videos
Additional links and references
Supplementary InformationEdit Supplementary Information
|