Case study:Merikoski fishway: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Case study status
{{Case study status
|Approval status=Draft
|Approval status=Approved
}}
}}
{{Location
{{Location
Line 15: Line 15:
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River
|Multi-site=No
|Multi-site=No
|Project summary=Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merkoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003 enabling migrating fish to rise up to the lower reaches of the river.
|Project picture=Oulujoki.PNG
|Picture description=The Merikoski Fishway (Photo: Pinja Kasvio)
|Project summary=Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merikoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003. The constructed fishway now enables salmon and other migtating fish to rise up 40 km to the lower reaches of the Oulujoki river.
Migratory fishes are planted into the Merikoski every year. Also the fish migration, the amount and types of the fishes are monitored with the help of underwater videocamera and fish counter.
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Oulujoki River Basin
|Subcatchment=Oulujoki River Basin
Line 27: Line 34:
|Protected species present=No
|Protected species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Invasive species present=No
|Species=Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar),
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated
|Dominant hydrology=Artificially regulated
}}
}}
Line 42: Line 50:
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
Line 49: Line 55:
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Latest revision as of 07:06, 6 September 2013

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 65° 1' 18.97" N, 25° 29' 15.05" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Fisheries, Habitat and biodiversity, Hydropower
Country Finland
Main contact forename Anne
Main contact surname Laine
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment for North Ostrobothnia
Contact organisation web site http://www.oulunenergia.fi/ymparistovastuu/kalatie
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Restoration of Oulujoki River

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
The Merikoski Fishway (Photo: Pinja Kasvio)

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


Construction of the fishway in the Merikoski brook was the first step restoring the Oulujoki river for migrating fish. Merikoski water power plant was the lowest obstacle for fish migration before the fishway was constructed in 2003. The constructed fishway now enables salmon and other migtating fish to rise up 40 km to the lower reaches of the Oulujoki river. Migratory fishes are planted into the Merikoski every year. Also the fish migration, the amount and types of the fishes are monitored with the help of underwater videocamera and fish counter.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Catchment

River basin district -
River basin Oulujoki River basin

Subcatchment

River name Oulujoki River
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2) 2284122,841 km² <br />2,284,100 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology
Ecoregion Fenno-Scandian Shield
Dominant land cover
Waterbody ID



Site

Name Merikoski torrent water power plant
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Artificial channel
Reference morphology Artificial channel, Fishway
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body Yes
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest Brown trout (Salmo trutta), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)
Dominant hydrology Artificially regulated
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started
Works started
Works completed
Project completed
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information