Case study:Malltraeth Marsh: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:
• improved bank profiles to the many ditches that traverse the floodplain
• improved bank profiles to the many ditches that traverse the floodplain
}}
}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Toggle button}}
{{Toggle content start}}
{{Case study subcatchment
{{Case study subcatchment
|Subcatchment=Cefin
|Subcatchment=Cefin
Line 63: Line 67:
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Monitoring documents end}}
{{Image gallery}}
{{Image gallery end}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
{{Additional Documents end}}
Line 70: Line 72:
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Additional links and references footer}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Supplementary Information}}
{{Toggle content end}}

Revision as of 06:33, 6 September 2013

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 53° 12' 53.43" N, 4° 19' 42.23" W
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity
Country Wales
Main contact forename Nick
Main contact surname Elbourne
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation River Restoration Centre
Contact organisation web site http://www.therrc.co.uk
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
Wetland and open water restoration, Malltraeth Marsh.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The channel was canalised, embanked, and virtually featureless carrying highland water from upstream across a flat lowland valley. Marsh either side is grazing land designated as SSSI. Aims of the project: • To restore the open water characteristics of remnant cut-off channels of the Cefni that were being to be lost through drying and reed/rush/sweet-grass invasion. • Combined with local restoration of high water tables, these measures ensured that the wildlife interests which gave rise to its notification as an SSSI are maintained and enhanced. Works carried out: • excavation of drying relic meanders and other open water areas • sluices on drains/ditches to raise water levels in summer • sluices and/or bunds to raise winter water levels • willow/scrub control and other vegetation management • improved bank profiles to the many ditches that traverse the floodplain

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.


Image gallery


ShowHideAdditionalImage.png


Catchment and subcatchment

Subcatchment:Cefin


Site

Name Malltraeth Marsh
WFD water body codes
WFD (national) typology
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Embanked, Straightened
Reference morphology Wetland marsh
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body No
National/international site designation UK - Site of Special Scientific Interest
Local/regional site designations Special Area of Conservation
Protected species present No
Invasive species present No
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology
Dominant substrate
River corridor land use Wetland, Rough unimproved grassland/pasture
Average bankfull channel width category
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Reach length directly affected (m) 70007,000 m <br />7 km <br />700,000 cm <br />
Project started 1993
Works started
Works completed
Project completed 1996/01/01
Total cost category
Total cost (k€)
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design
Stakeholder engagement and communication
Works and works supervision
Post-project management and maintenance
Monitoring



Reasons for river restoration

Mitigation of a pressure Impoundments (not hydropower)
Hydromorphology
Biology
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project


Measures

Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications excavation of historic channels, increase bed levels
Floodplain / River corridor Creation of wetlands, reinstate floodplain
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions
Social measures (incl. engagement)
Other


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Biological quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Physico-chemical quality elements

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents



Additional documents and videos


Additional links and references

Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information