Case study:Vén-Duna (Old-Danube) sidearm’s revitalization: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(XML import)
 
No edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
       46.212476907,18.900175095
       46.212476907,18.900175095
}}
}}
{{Project_overview
{{Project overview
|Status=
|Status=Complete
   
|Themes=Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
   
|Country=Hungary
      Complete
|Main contact forename=Bela
|Project web site url=
|Main contact surname=Csanyi
     
|Contact organisation=„VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC
|Themes=
|Name of parent multi-site project=Case_study:Reduction of Nutrient Discharges Project
      Habitat and biodiversity,Water quality,Monitoring
|Multi-site=No
|Country=
|Project summary=The aim of the project was to obtain knowledge and experience on possibilities how to restore natural hydro-morphologic conditions and the connectivity between the river and floodplain zone. The main objective of the implementations was to provide a direct water flow connection between the Danube main stream and the side arm in order to restore the natural biodiversity and rheophilic communities typical for aquatic floodplain landscapes. The re-opening was accompanied by an extensive scientific research and monitoring program, which showed changes in riverbed morphology upstream and downstream of the rock dam. Restored high floods increased sediment transport, erosion and deposition. Suitable habitats for rheophilous invertebrate and fish species as well as species diversity and population numbers typical for dynamic water bodies increased.
      Hungary
|Main contact forename=
      Bela
|Main contact surname=
      Csanyi
|Main contact id=
     
|Contact organisation=
      „VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC
|Contact organisation url=
     
|Partner organisations=
     
|Multi-site=
     
|Name of parent multi-site project=
      Case_study:Reduction of Nutrient Discharges Project
|Project picture=
     
|Picture description=
     
|Project summary=
     
}}
}}
{{Case_study_subcatchment
{{Case_study_subcatchment

Revision as of 06:57, 4 July 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 46° 12' 44.92" N, 18° 54' 0.63" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site
Themes Habitat and biodiversity, Monitoring, Water quality
Country Hungary
Main contact forename Bela
Main contact surname Csanyi
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation „VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
Parent multi-site project

Case_study:Reduction of Nutrient Discharges Project

This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
No
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The aim of the project was to obtain knowledge and experience on possibilities how to restore natural hydro-morphologic conditions and the connectivity between the river and floodplain zone. The main objective of the implementations was to provide a direct water flow connection between the Danube main stream and the side arm in order to restore the natural biodiversity and rheophilic communities typical for aquatic floodplain landscapes. The re-opening was accompanied by an extensive scientific research and monitoring program, which showed changes in riverbed morphology upstream and downstream of the rock dam. Restored high floods increased sediment transport, erosion and deposition. Suitable habitats for rheophilous invertebrate and fish species as well as species diversity and population numbers typical for dynamic water bodies increased.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Danube

Subcatchment

River name Old-Danube side arm
Area category more than 10000 km²
Area (km2) 181000 km²18,100,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 100 - 200 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Hungarian Lowlands
Dominant land cover Woodland, Wetland
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Vén-Duna (Old-Danube) sidearm
WFD water body codes AEP444
WFD (national) typology Danube between Szob and Baja
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Artifical oxbow cut-off from the main river
Reference morphology Sidearm
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body
National/international site designation EU - Special Area of Conservation
Local/regional site designations National Park, Natura 2000, Ramsar
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Lentic
Dominant substrate Sand, Silt
River corridor land use Intensive agriculture (arable), Urban, Plantation forestry
Average bankfull channel width category more than 50 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 5 - 10 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s) 24002,400 m³/s <br />2,400,000 l/s <br />
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m) 4500 m4.5 km <br />450,000 cm <br />
Project started 1992/04/01
Works started 1998/08/01
Works completed 2004/09/01
Project completed
Total cost category 50 - 100 k€
Total cost (k€) 66 k€66,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources RIZA (Institute for Inland Water

Management and Waste Water Treatment of the Netherlands)

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design RIZA (Institute for Inland Water

Management and Waste Water Treatment of the Netherlands)

Stakeholder engagement and communication „VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC
Works and works supervision „VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC
Post-project management and maintenance „VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC
Monitoring „VITUKI” Environmental and Water Management Research. Institute Non-Profit Public LLC Bela Csanyi



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure
Hydromorphology Substrate conditions, Quantity & dynamics of flow, Continuity for organisms
Biology Fish: Abundance, Fish: Species composition, Phytoplankton: Blooms
Physico-chemical Nutrient concentrations, Oxygen balance, Temperature
Other reasons for the project Recreation, Landscape enhancement, Community demand


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Removal of weirs, Dredging
Floodplain / River corridor Construction of new sluices
Planform / Channel pattern
Other
Non-structural measures
Management interventions Ensuring biodiversity
Social measures (incl. engagement) Recreation
Other Information provision, Consultation


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Substrate conditions Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Fish: Species composition Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Invertebrates Yes Yes Improvement

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Nutrient concentrations Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Oxygen balance Yes Yes Yes Improvement
Temperature Yes Improvement

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery



Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information