Case study:Rehabilitation of Benta stream: Difference between revisions

From RESTORE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
{{Project overview
{{Project overview
|Status=Complete
|Status=Complete
|Project web site url=www.kdvvizig.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&catid=83:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&Itemid=99
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
|Themes=Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
|Country=Hungary
|Country=Hungary

Revision as of 06:32, 4 July 2013

This case study is pending approval by a RiverWiki administrator.

Approve case study

 

0.00
(0 votes)


To discuss or comment on this case study, please use the discussion page.


Location: 47° 19' 7.50" N, 18° 56' 12.57" E
Loading map...
Left click to look around in the map, and use the wheel of your mouse to zoom in and out.


Project overview

Edit project overview
Status Complete
Project web site http://www.kdvvizig.hu/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=73:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&catid=83:benta-patak-rehabilitacioja&Itemid=99
Themes Flood risk management, Habitat and biodiversity
Country Hungary
Main contact forename Norbertné
Main contact surname Józsa
Main contact user ID
Contact organisation Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate
Contact organisation web site
Partner organisations
This is a parent project
encompassing the following
projects
This case study hasn’t got a picture, you can add one by editing the project overview.

Project summary

Edit project overview to modify the project summary.


The investment was necessary because of the large amount of occasional and extreme amount of rainfalls and meltwaters caused serious problems in the surrounding communities for many years mainly because of the increased sediment deposition in the streambed. During the project, a total of 38 600 m3 sludge was removed from the steam. Landscape remediation was done on almost 50 thousand square meters of land. Spawning areas were constructed for native protected fish species, such as spined loach and weatherfish.

Monitoring surveys and results

This case study hasn’t got any Monitoring survey and results, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Lessons learnt

This case study hasn’t got any lessons learnt, you can add some by editing the project overview.

Catchment and subcatchment

Select a catchment/subcatchment


Edit the catchment and subcatchment details
(affects all case studies in this subcatchment)

Catchment

River basin district Danube
River basin Danube

Subcatchment

River name Benta stream
Area category 100 - 1000 km²
Area (km2) 410 km²41,000 ha <br />
Maximum altitude category 200 - 500 m
Maximum altitude (m)
Dominant geology Calcareous
Ecoregion Hungarian Lowlands
Dominant land cover Urban, Woodland
Waterbody ID



Site

Edit site
Name Benta stream
WFD water body codes AEP318
WFD (national) typology 18
WFD water body name
Pre-project morphology Single channel, Straight, Revetments
Reference morphology Single channel, Sinuous
Desired post project morphology
Heavily modified water body false
National/international site designation
Local/regional site designations
Protected species present
Invasive species present
Species of interest
Dominant hydrology Permanent lotic
Dominant substrate Gravel
River corridor land use Urban, Industry, Intensive agriculture
Average bankfull channel width category 2 - 5 m
Average bankfull channel width (m)
Average bankfull channel depth category 0.5 - 2 m
Average bankfull channel depth (m)
Mean discharge category
Mean annual discharge (m3/s)
Average channel gradient category
Average channel gradient
Average unit stream power (W/m2)


Project background

Edit project background
Reach length directly affected (m)
Project started 2008/08/01
Works started 2009/06/01
Works completed 2011/05/01
Project completed
Total cost category 1000 - 5000 k€
Total cost (k€) 2463 k€2,463,000 € <br />
Benefit to cost ratio
Funding sources Operational Program of New Hungary Development Plan, EU funded

Cost for project phases

Phase cost category cost exact (k€) Lead organisation Contact forename Contact surname
Investigation and design Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate
Stakeholder engagement and communication Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate
Works and works supervision Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate
Post-project management and maintenance Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate
Monitoring Middle-Danube-Valley Water Management Directorate



Reasons for river restoration

Edit reasons for restoration
Mitigation of a pressure Flood defence, Riparian development
Hydromorphology Quantity & dynamics of flow, Structure & condition of riparian zones
Biology Fish: Species composition
Physico-chemical
Other reasons for the project Flood risk management, Landscape enhancement, Community demand


Measures

Edit Measures
Structural measures
Bank/bed modifications Renewal of reventments, Removal of sediment, Planting, Creation of fish spawn nursing places, Creation of piplines
Floodplain / River corridor
Planform / Channel pattern
Other Reparation of sluice gates
Non-structural measures
Management interventions channel maintenance
Social measures (incl. engagement) Floodprotection, landenhancement
Other Information provision


Monitoring

Hydromorphological quality elements

Edit Hydromorphological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
Quantity & dynamics of flow Yes Yes Improvement
Structure & condition of riparian zones Yes Yes Improvement

Biological quality elements

Edit biological
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Physico-chemical quality elements

Edit Physico-chemical
quality elements
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative
[[]]

Any other monitoring, e.g. social, economic

Edit Other responses
Element When monitored Type of monitoring Control site used Result
Before measures After measures Qualitative Quantitative


Monitoring documents

Upload monitoring documents



Image gallery


Benta stream_1
Benta stram_2


Additional documents and videos

Upload additional documents


Additional links and references

Edit links and references
Link Description

Supplementary Information

Edit Supplementary Information